mix

mix150.com MIX150 DOWNLOAD GAMES PLAYSTATION RIP FILMS
Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts

Sunday, April 22, 2012

The Internet Protocol IPv6: A universal language

ScienceDaily (Dec. 12, 2011) — We are at the dawn of the age of IPv6, the Internet protocol that will succeed version 4. With 340 undecillion available addresses, IPv6 ensures that the Internet can continue growing and offers advantages in terms of stability, flexibility, and simplicity in network administration.

We talked about the new protocol with two research groups: the Wireless Networks Group, based at the Barcelona School of Telecommunications Engineering, and Design and Evaluation of Broadband Networks and Services, based at the Castelldefels School of Telecommunications and Aerospace Engineering. Both schools are centres of the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. BarcelonaTech (UPC).

The Internet is a communications network formed by millions of interconnected computers that share data and resources. All the computers on the network use the Internet protocol (IP) so that users can read a web page or send an e-mail and be sure that information is properly sent and received. The protocol assigns a numeric code (IP address) to each device on the network in order to identify it. In other words, "the IP protocol is the universal language that allows all the devices connected to the Internet to understand each other," says Xavier Hesselbach, a member of the research group on Design and Evaluation of Broadband Networks and Services.

IPv4, the first commercial version of the Internet protocol, is still widely used. It was created in the early 1980s under the direction of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), the organisation in charge of developing and promoting new technological standards for use on the Internet. When IPv4 was initially deployed, the Internet consisted of a relatively small number of computers, used mainly by universities and the military. As a result, it was possible to introduce version 4 of the protocol in a single day, 1 January 1983, known as Flag Day. At the time, no one could imagine reaching the current 4 billion addresses. But with the passage of time the situation has changed completely. According to data published in 2011 by Internet World Stats, over the last decade the number of users connected to the network went from 300 million to almost 2 billion. Using a PC or laptop to access the Internet from home, or connecting via a smartphone or tablet is no longer anything out of the ordinary. And these are no longer the only devices hooked up to the Internet. Sensors that measure temperature, humidity, or a patient's vital signs, and smart tags that provide information on the origin of a product and update its price are among the devices that require an IP address to form part of the network.

As we have connected more and more devices to the Internet, the number of IP addresses available under version 4 of the protocol has diminished at a spectacular rate and they are now running out, even though in many cases various devices share the same address using a mechanism known as network address translation (NAT). On 3 February 2011, the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), the organisation that oversees global IP address allocation, assigned the last block of addresses (33 million) to the Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC), one of five regional Internet registries, which is responsible for managing addresses for Asia, Australia and New Zealand.

The problem of IPv4 address exhaustion was first raised in 1990. The IETF recognised that there were not enough addresses to meet projected demand and that they would eventually run out. At that point, work began to develop the next version of the protocol for sending and receiving data over the Internet: version 6 or IPv6.

A business opportunity Version 6 of the Internet protocol supports a mind-boggling 340 billion billion billion billion (340 undecillion) addresses. This solves the problem of IPv4 address exhaustion; addresses no longer need to be shared, and the problems this gives rise to are avoided. There are more than enough IPv6 addresses to assign one to every computer, mobile phone, refrigerator, washing machine, car, or power point we may wish to connect to the Internet, and this connectivity makes it possible to communicate directly with these devices.

"Such a substantial number of addresses could facilitate the deployment of what has been called the Internet of Things, a network in which objects as well as users are identified," says Anna Calveras, a researcher with the Wireless Networks Group. "All the devices you can imagine could have their own networks and communicate with each other," she concludes.

This technology has countless applications. At the moment, "the focus is on applications in the context of the home, building control, smart cities, and industry," says Carles G?mez, who also works with the Wireless Networks Group. "Behind this development, there's a whole industry promoting the standardisation of mechanisms for using IPv6 in these environments. A lot of people are realising that this technology represents a business opportunity," he adds.

IPv6 has other advantages. One aspect of the protocol that the UPC scientific community is enthusiastic about is its autoconfiguration mechanism. Any device connected to the network automatically obtains a unique IP address and other parameters needed to communicate. No human intervention is required in this process. This mechanism is particularly useful when a large number of devices need to be connected to the network, as in the case of the Internet of Things.

According to Jordi Casademont, another researcher with the Wireless Networks Group, an additional advantage is that "IPv6 is designed to strengthen security and increase communications quality of service." IPv6 also makes information easier to process, an improvement that affects devices though it has no direct impact on users. According to Rafael Vidal, the researcher who coordinates the Wireless Networks Group, "one of the problems with Internet networks is that links have become very fast, but the elements through which information passes have to do so much work that in the end these elements, known as routers, can become a communication bottleneck. With version 6 of the protocol, it's possible to do more with the same router capacity. As a result, there aren't so many congestion problems and information can be transmitted more smoothly."

Adapting to the protocol Although IPv6 is an approved standard, it is being deployed at a very slow rate. For over ten years, the research community has been insisting on the need to make the transition, and many have noted that despite its availability the technology is not being widely used. One reason for this is that IPv4 and IPv6 are not compatible, which makes the transition much more complicated. Experts do not foresee any problems with the use of the Internet in the immediate future, but address exhaustion could lead to complications in some areas.

The need is most acute in countries like China, where the number of Internet users is increasing exponentially, and other Asian and African countries that have been assigned a very limited number of IP addresses.

Clearly if the transition does not take place, the Internet will not be able to grow, and there will come a day when it is no longer possible to connect new users and devices. It may even become impossible for current IPv4 users to connect to those with IPv6 addresses. But deployment is not a simple issue to resolve, and everything appears to indicate that it will not happen in a harmonised way. The various Internet actors (service providers, makers of hardware, operating systems, applications, etc) may know what their own plans are for the transition to IPv6, but at present there is no global plan.

Recommend this story on Facebook, Twitter,
and Google +1:

Other bookmarking and sharing tools:

Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC).

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.


View the original article here

Saturday, December 17, 2011

3 Mobile Deals With Unlimited Internet Released for HTC Sensation XL

The latest HTC Sensation phone which features the largest touch screen display released to date by the manufacturer has now been picked up by the UK mobile network 3 Mobile, the new HTC Sensation XL can now be ordered by consumers on the networks coveted 'One Plan' deals which include unlimited internet access.

As an Android powered handset, the Sensation XL relies heavily on connections to the internet to update downloaded applications, retrieve emails, keep services such as news and weather forecasts maintained and facilitate social networking so these new 3 Mobile HTC Sensation XL deals with 'All You Can Eat' data are an ideal match for this high specification smart phone.

One Plan deals for the new HTC Sensation XL start at £35 line rental per month, although a free phone is not currently available at this price it is offered at the next price band up costing £40 per month, however this higher tariff works out to be £120 more expensive over the minimum term 24 month agreement so it is well worth considering paying the upfront price of £79 on the lower tariff.

Both of these 'One Plan' HTC Sensation XL deals include exactly the same volumes of inclusive minutes of calls, text messages and that unlimited data so for the sake of paying a little upfront cost the consumer will save money over the contract period.

So what does the new HTC Sensation XL offer?

As mentioned, this latest Android phone features a large 4.7 inch touch screen display which is the same found on the new HTC Titan although this is a Windows powered device, there is only one other smart phone on the market that can top the size of the screen which is Samsung's new Galaxy Note which measures a staggering 5.3 inches and is closer to being a tablet device rather than a phone.

Powering the Super LCD display of the Sensation XL is a 1.5GHz processor along with a good-sized 1600 mAh battery, although not as fast as the dual core 1.5GHz processor of the new HTC Sensation XE the XL runs smoothly and provides plenty of battery life.

On the back of the phone is an 8 mega pixel camera which matches that of the best-selling Samsung Galaxy S2 and new iPhone 4S and offers HD video capture at 720p as well as a dual LED flash for snapping in poor light.

The unique selling point of this new smart phone is that it features HTC's newly acquired Beats Audio technology which only found in one other handset; the Sensation XE, this new music software further enhances the listeners experience both through the branded earphones that come in the box as well as the phones external speaker system.

This latest release of the HTC Sensation XL on 3 Mobile follows launches just last week on O2, T-Mobile, Vodafone and Orange contract deals leaving just the virtual network; Talk Mobile to pick up this great new phone.

If you would like to see the latest HTC Sensation XE deals or perhaps take a look at the brand new iPhone 4S deals now available then please head over to our website: Phones Limited.


View the original article here

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Graphene's shining light could lead to super-fast Internet

ScienceDaily (Aug. 31, 2011) — Writing in the journal Nature Communications, a collaboration between the Universities of Manchester and Cambridge, which includes Nobel Prize winning scientists Professor Andre Geim and Professor Kostya Novoselov, has discovered a crucial recipe for improving characteristics of graphene devices for use as photodetectors in future high-speed optical communications.

By combining graphene with metallic nanostructures, they show a twenty-fold enhancement in harvesting light by graphene, which paves the way for advances in high-speed internet and other communications.

By putting two closely-spaced metallic wires on top of graphene and shining light on this structure, researchers previously showed that this generates electric power. This simple device presents an elementary solar cell.

More importantly for applications, such graphene devices can be incredibly fast, tens and potentially hundred times faster than communication rates in the fastest internet cables, which is due to the unique nature of electrons in graphene, their high mobility and high velocity.

The major stumbling block towards practical applications for these otherwise very promising devices has so far been their low efficiency. The problem is that graphene -- the thinnest material in the world -- absorbs little light, approximately only 3%, with the rest going through without contributing to the electrical power.

The Manchester researchers have solved the problems by combining graphene with tiny metallic structures, specially arranged on top of graphene.

These so-called plasmonic nanostructures have dramatically enhanced the optical electric field felt by graphene and effectively concentrated light within the one-atom-thick carbon layer.

By using the plasmonic enhancement, the light-harvesting performance of graphene was boosted by twenty times, without sacrificing any of its speed. The future efficiency can be improved even further.

Dr Alexander Grigorenko, an expert in plasmonics and a leading member of the team, said: "Graphene seems a natural companion for plasmonics. We expected that plasmonic nanostructures could improve the efficiency of graphene-based devices but it has come as a pleasant surprise that the improvements can be so dramatic."

Professor Novoselov added: "The technology of graphene production matures day-by-day, which has an immediate impact both on the type of exciting physics which we find in this material, and on the feasibility and the range of possible applications.

"Many leading electronics companies consider graphene for the next generation of devices. This work certainly boosts graphene's chances even further."

Professor Andrea Ferrari, from the Cambridge Engineering Department, who lead the Cambridge effort in the collaboration, said "So far, the main focus of graphene research has been on fundamental physics and electronic devices.

"These results show its great potential in the fields of photonics and optoelectronics, where the combination of its unique optical and electronic properties with plasmonic nanostructures, can be fully exploited, even in the absence of a bandgap, in a variety of useful devices, such as solar cells and photodetectors."

Graphene is a novel two-dimensional material which can be seen as a monolayer of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice.

It is a wonder material that possesses a large number of unique properties and is currently considered in many new technologies.

Recommend this story on Facebook, Twitter,
and Google +1:

Other bookmarking and sharing tools:

Story Source:

The above story is reprinted (with editorial adaptations by ScienceDaily staff) from materials provided by University of Manchester, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.

Journal Reference:

T.J. Echtermeyer, L. Britnell, P.K. Jasnos, A. Lombardo, R.V. Gorbachev, A.N. Grigorenko, A.K. Geim, A.C. Ferrari, K.S. Novoselov. Strong plasmonic enhancement of photovoltage in graphene. Nature Communications, 2011; 2: 458 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1464

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.


View the original article here

Thursday, September 29, 2011

Wireless Internet Comparison

There are several options today for going online with your laptop or cell phone while on the go. These mobile Internet access options range from using free wi-fi at a hotspot to having a mobile broadband (e.g., 3G) network device on your laptop or a mobile hotspot device for "anywhere, anytime" Internet access over a cellular network.

Although wi-fi and 3G can be considered complementary technologies, sometimes you have to choose one over the other for either budget reasons (mobile Internet data plans, especially for multiple devices, can be costly) or technological limitations (when the Apple iPad first came out, for example, users had to choose between getting a wi-fi-only model or wait for the version that offered 3G as well as wi-fi).

Here's a look at the pros and cons of different ways to stay connected while traveling or just on the run. (They're ordered below by least to most expensive options, but each has benefits and disadvantages.)

These are public locations (airports, hotels, coffeeshops) where you can connect your smartphone or laptop wirelessly to the establishment's Internet service. Pros: many hotspots are free, you can find them fairly easily in urban and suburban areas, and food and drinks are often available for purchaseCons: Can be costly even if it's free (you should buy the establishment's coffee/food/etc. That's rule #3 in The Starbuckian Handbook). Wi-Fi hotspots are also usually unsecured (no WPA encryption), and to use the hotspot you have to locate it first, then physically be within range of the hotspot's access point.Best for: using as an occasional virtual office or while traveling

More: What is a Wi-Fi Hotspot? | Directory of Free Wi-Fi Hotspots

Internet cafes rent out computer workstations and sometimes also provide wi-fi Internet access.

Pros: You don't need to tote a laptop with you, the cafe may have printers/scanners available, and you can often also buy food or drinksCons: Fewer locations than wi-fi hotspots, can get expensive if you need to work on them for long periods of time, may be prone to viruses/other security issuesBest for: travelers (especially international travel), quick/emergency Internet needs

More: What is an Internet Cafe? | Internet Cafe Directories

On some cellular networks you can use your cell phone as a modem for your laptop to go online.

Pros: Go online anywhere you have a cellular signal, more secure web surfing than sending data over a public open wireless hotspot, depending on your cell phone provider you may not have to pay any extra fees (besides the cell phone's data plan)Cons: Reception can be spotty in some areas or conditions, slowest speed of these options, not allowed by some carriers and/or you may be charged extra for tetheringBest for: Internet access when there's no wi-fi available

More: What Is Tethering? | How to Tether | Bluetooth Tethering

Using a built-in mobile broadband card or a USB modem on your laptop or portable mobile hotspot device, you can get high speed wireless Internet on your laptop wherever you go.

Pros: Go online anywhere you have a cellular signal, speeds comparable to residential DSLCons: Reception can be spotty in some areas or conditions, usually metered or capped at 5GB per month of dataBest for: Occasional to regular Internet use in locations when there's no wi-fi available

More: What is Mobile Broadband? | Mobile Broadband Plans and Services | How To Get 4G or 3G on Your Laptop

Must be at the hotspot or cybercafe. Around 300,000 wi-fi hotspots around the worldOnly ~5,000 Internet cafes listed in cybercafe directoriesVirtually Everywhere: Connect wherever you can get a cellular signal. 3G/4G speeds not available in all marketsGenerally DSL or cable speeds from 768 kbps to 50 mbps. Wi-fi also is limited to the location's wi-fi protocol speed: 11 mbps to 54 mbpsNot as fast as wi-fi; <1 mbps (tethering) to over 10 mbps (for 4G). Tethering is slowest3G ranges from 1 to 1.5 mbps4G promises 10X the speed of 3GFree to ~$10/per hour Many hotspots are free. Frequent travelers may want a dedicated wi-fi Internet service plan for connecting to hotspots across the US and internationally with one account.Cybercafe rates typically reflect the country's cost of living. Many US cybercafes charge $10/hour, while cybercafes in Ecuador are about $1/hour.Mobile broadband is usually $60/month. Tethering usually costs the same but is in addition to the cell phone data plan.

View the original article here

Saturday, September 10, 2011

Internet TV: Canadian growth could be stunted

As the lion's share of television transmission towers make the switch from analog to digital on Aug. 31, more Canadians are also watching television through other channels entirely, most notably on the internet.

According to a study conducted by the think-tank Media Technology Monitor, 34 per cent of Canadian internet users watch TV online, for about 30 minutes each week. Indeed, the percentage of Canadians who accessed the internet through their television, whether to surf or otherwise, rose to eight per cent in spring 2011, up one full percentage point from last fall.

For Tom Copeland, chair of the Canadian Association of Internet Providers, this trend does not come as a surprise.

"I think it's just another way to deliver the content," he said. "If you look at things historically, we started with over-the-air signals and moved to cable and satellite.

"This isn't a revolution, it's an evolution."

And while this evolution is giving Canadians more freedom in the way they access television content, the technology remains in its infancy in this country, largely because of the heavy caps put on internet use by the major internet service providers. The mid-range priced plan with Rogers, for example, caps users at 60GB per month.

Gregory Taylor, a post-doctoral researcher at Ryerson University in Toronto who has studied internet access in Canada extensively, suggests these caps belie Canadians' overall usage of the internet.

"As far as broadband access goes, we're among the highest users of internet in the world," he said.

"These caps, though, are restrictive when it comes to watching television online," Taylor said.

John Lawford, counsel for the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, a consumer watchdog group, says these caps will continue to leave Canadians in the dark in comparison to countries like the United States, where over-the-top television services like Netflix and Hulu are used by a large amount of online users.

"[The caps] are effective barriers to entry for over-the-top television and movie services in Canada because they're lower than most other countries," he said. "In the States, where caps can average 200 or 300GB per month, the average viewer can get away with watching a decent amount of high quality content.

"Here, our caps are low enough that they overage fees may kick in just when those services, like Netflix, might be useful."

Despite the caps, Canadians are still signing on to Netflix at a decent speed: the MTM report indicates six per cent of Canadians have subscribed to the online service since its launch in Sept. 2010.

Lawford, however, says these numbers may be deceiving as they do not indicate the percentage of those subscribers who use the service on a regular basis.

"You might try Netflix for a month but then when a massive bill comes in, it may not be worth it," he said, indicating subscribers may just keep the service for irregular, off-chance use.

"But the internet service providers, who also happen to be owned by companies that now own content, can be gatekeepers and protect their own services," he said. "Rogers' on-demand service online, for example, doesn't count towards your cap. That's cheating, as far as I'm concerned."

However, discussions on internet caps have been mired in a regulatory swamp for months, Taylor says.

"There have been repeated hearings at the CRTC about this issue and there is no clear answer," he said. " These talks include whether something like Netflix should be able to offer unlimited downloading when they're using Bell's [network] backbone, for example."

For Lawford, the regulatory red tape has been stretched far enough.

"The broadcasters got together and forced the CRTC's hand into conducting another investigation into over-the-top content providers," he said, pointing out Canada's regulator had already discussed the issue two years prior. "What changed? The only thing that changed is that Netflix came to town and was an enormous success.

"Is it really destroying Canadian television? I think it's complimentary, not confrontational."

According to Taylor, the argument from companies like Bell and Rogers is that if caps were higher or non-existent, their online networks would end up in a log-jam with everyone free to download as much content as they see fit.

Tom Copeland says if network congestion was an actual concern for the major telecommunications companies, monthly usage caps do not address this problem at all.

"The caps are arbitrary and artificial in nature," he said. "That a person who wants to watch 100GB of video, evenly distributed over three to four hours a night, may not be causing any congestion on the network and yet they're going to get that big bill at the end of the month.

"If the purpose is to better manage the traffic on the network, then you should be managing it when the congestion occurs and where it occurs. This is simply the case of applying a user fee above and beyond what people pay."

As it stands, a company like Netflix, in essence an online broadcaster, does not have to pay into the various production improvement funds like other companies do — funds that benefit the continued production of Canadian content. Some argue that if Netflix continues to proliferate into more Canadian homes, it should be beholden to the same regulations as its traditional counterparts.

Lawford says this will prove to be the next major hurdle for the company and they may decline the challenge.

"The broadcasters want to convince the CRTC that Netflix is looking to operate as a direct competitor when in essence they would compliment the system and offer more access to content," he said.

"These new rules that would put Netflix under the umbrella of a broadcaster, albeit over the internet, would be so prohibitive because of all the regulatory hoops that they may not bother with their Canadian operations.

"If they did, they'd have a massive uphill battle against these fully integrated companies that have been in existence for decades."

He points out that if things do not change, Canadians could find themselves lagging behind other countries in terms of the creation of new, homegrown, internet-based content, created without the need for big broadcaster dollars.

"Who's to say what is Canadian content?" he asked. "Maybe there would be a period where new content wasn't created by Astral or CTV but in the same time span there could exist a dearth of user-generated or independent content."

No matter the arguments made for or against watching television online, the reality of the situation suggests that its popularity will continue to rise in Canada, says Taylor.

"Canada is an early test case for internet television because it's the first country outside the United States to get Netflix," he said. "In the U.S., Netflix itself constitutes something like 20 per cent of internet traffic during prime time.

"That's why this service matters so much in this argument — It's not at that level yet in Canada."

"I want to see if anyone else will come in the marketplace," said Lawford.

"Anytime people with a whole bunch of broadcasting interests tell you that they're the best way to give it to you, it really doesn't work that way.

"They don't have a lock on the future and they can't see whether they have the best way to deliver content."

Accessibility Links

View the original article here

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Internet Connection Sharing Definition

Definition:

Internet Connection Sharing, or ICS, is a built-in feature of Windows computers (Windows 98, 2000, Me, and Vista) that allows multiple computers to connect to the Internet using one single Internet connection on one computer. It's a type of local area network (LAN) that uses a single computer as the gateway (or host) through which other devices connect to the Internet. Computers wired to the gateway computer or connecting to it wirelessly via an ad-hoc wireless network can use ICS.

Some of the features of Internet Connection Sharing include:

Allowing most any kind of device (including non-Windows and older Windows systems) to connect without having to install additional client software.Support for all of the connected clients to use many different protocols, including VPN and Internet gaming.Clients are automatically given an IP address and configured for DNS through the ICS computer.

In Windows 98 or Windows Me, ICS needed to be enabled or installed on the host computer from the Control Panel Add/Remove Programs (on the Windows Setup tab, double-click on Internet Tools, then select Internet Connection Sharing). Windows XP, Vista, and Windows 7 have this built-in already (look in the Local Area Connection properties for a setting under the Sharing tab to "Allow other network users to connect through this computer's internet connection").

Note: ICS requires the host computer to have a wired connection to a modem (e.g., DSL or cable modem) or an aircard or other mobile data modem, and the client computers either wired to your host computer or connecting to it via the host computer's free wireless adapter.

Learn how to use Internet Connection Sharing:


View the original article here

Saturday, July 30, 2011

Internet Connection Sharing Definition

Definition:

Internet Connection Sharing, or ICS, is a built-in feature of Windows computers (Windows 98, 2000, Me, and Vista) that allows multiple computers to connect to the Internet using one single Internet connection on one computer. It's a type of local area network (LAN) that uses a single computer as the gateway (or host) through which other devices connect to the Internet. Computers wired to the gateway computer or connecting to it wirelessly via an ad-hoc wireless network can use ICS.

Some of the features of Internet Connection Sharing include:

Allowing most any kind of device (including non-Windows and older Windows systems) to connect without having to install additional client software.Support for all of the connected clients to use many different protocols, including VPN and Internet gaming.Clients are automatically given an IP address and configured for DNS through the ICS computer.

In Windows 98 or Windows Me, ICS needed to be enabled or installed on the host computer from the Control Panel Add/Remove Programs (on the Windows Setup tab, double-click on Internet Tools, then select Internet Connection Sharing). Windows XP, Vista, and Windows 7 have this built-in already (look in the Local Area Connection properties for a setting under the Sharing tab to "Allow other network users to connect through this computer's internet connection").

Note: ICS requires the host computer to have a wired connection to a modem (e.g., DSL or cable modem) or an aircard or other mobile data modem, and the client computers either wired to your host computer or connecting to it via the host computer's free wireless adapter.

Learn how to use Internet Connection Sharing:


source from about.com

Boost Home Internet

Fast and reliable Internet access can make all the difference between a good and an excruciating Web experience, and remote workers particularly need high speed Internet service that they can depend on. Get the most from your Internet service at home with these tips.

Test your Internet connection download and upload speeds at Speedtest.net or DSLReports.com to see if you're actually getting the rated connection speed from your ISP. You can also test your current mobile or home broadband speed at the FCC's Broadband.gov website and do your part in helping the FCC establish a national broadband plan; the FCC also has iPhone and Android apps for you to test your smartphone data speeds. (If you don't remember the speeds your plan is rated for, check your bill or the website of your Internet Service Provider.)

Although Internet speeds can and will vary depending on various factors (whether you're on a slower wireless rather than wired connection to the modem, if there's a lot of traffic congestion on the service, etc.), consistently getting much slower speeds than what your plan is rated for may signify a problem on your ISP's end. Call your provider or visit their website help section to find out how to get the speed you are paying for. Some ISPs have their own speed tests and automatic "Internet boosting" programs.

DNS servers translate domain names into the IP addresses of the web servers where the websites are hosted. When you sign up for Internet service, your ISP's DNS servers are set by default in the router, but you can change the settings to a faster, more reliable, and more up-to-date DNS server. OpenDNS has a free DNS service that also offers great control over your Internet browsing experience. Switching to OpenDNS servers can increase your Internet speeds.

You may also be able to increase your broadband speed by adjusting your network device settings or using web accelerators, as About's Guide to Wireless/Networking explains. The aforementioned DSL Reports resource also offers a free tweak test that can help optimize your connection speed by suggesting settings to modify based on a download test. One note of caution: speed tweaks can cause system instability and may only provide small speed increases that may not make all the effort worth it if your current online connection speeds are acceptable.

What's an acceptable speed? That's pretty much a relative matter. Most full-time mobile workers should at least be able to load web pages and send emails without attachments almost instantly -- or at least without having to watch hourglasses spin all day. (An ideal speed is South Korea's blazing 33.5 Mbps -- versus the world's average 7.6 Mbps download speed.)


source from about.com